Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
1.
Int J Environ Res Public Health ; 19(8)2022 04 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1785703

ABSTRACT

Exposure to atmospheric particulate matter and nitrogen dioxide has been linked to SARS-CoV-2 infection and death. We hypothesized that long-term exposure to farming-related air pollutants might predispose to an increased risk of COVID-19-related death. To test this hypothesis, we performed an ecological study of five Italian Regions (Piedmont, Lombardy, Veneto, Emilia-Romagna and Sicily), linking all-cause mortality by province (administrative entities within regions) to data on atmospheric concentrations of particulate matter (PM2.5 and PM10) and ammonia (NH3), which are mainly produced by agricultural activities. The study outcome was change in all-cause mortality during March-April 2020 compared with March-April 2015-2019 (period). We estimated all-cause mortality rate ratios (MRRs) by multivariate negative binomial regression models adjusting for air temperature, humidity, international import-export, gross domestic product and population density. We documented a 6.9% excess in MRR (proxy for COVID-19 mortality) for each tonne/km2 increase in NH3 emissions, explained by the interaction of the period variable with NH3 exposure, considering all pollutants together. Despite the limitations of the ecological design of the study, following the precautionary principle, we recommend the implementation of public health measures to limit environmental NH3 exposure, particularly while the COVID-19 pandemic continues. Future studies are needed to investigate any causal link between COVID-19 and farming-related pollution.


Subject(s)
Agriculture , Air Pollutants , Air Pollution , COVID-19 , Particulate Matter , Agriculture/statistics & numerical data , Air Pollutants/adverse effects , Air Pollutants/analysis , Air Pollution/adverse effects , Air Pollution/analysis , Air Pollution/statistics & numerical data , COVID-19/epidemiology , Environmental Exposure/adverse effects , Environmental Exposure/analysis , Epidemiologic Studies , Humans , Italy/epidemiology , Pandemics , Particulate Matter/adverse effects , Particulate Matter/analysis , SARS-CoV-2 , Sicily/epidemiology
2.
PLoS One ; 16(5): e0251715, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1238765

ABSTRACT

This paper explores to what extent product and marketing channel diversification contributed to the economic success of small-scale agricultural producers involved in short food supply chains after the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic. A survey was conducted between April and July 2020 in four countries of the European Union-Estonia, Hungary, Portugal and Romania,-resulting in a relatively large sample of farmers (N = 421). The analysis was built on a semi-nonparametric approach. Approximately 19 percent of small-scale producers were able to increase sales during the first wave of the pandemic, although country-level variation was significant. Fruits and vegetables were by far the most popular products. The importance of specific channels varied across countries, but farm gate sales were among the most important marketing channels both before and during the first wave. The importance of channels that were based on digital resources and home delivery increased. Our evidence indicates that diversification was a strategy that paid off, both in terms of marketing channels and different product categories. However, the impact appears to be nonlinear; the initial advantage generated by diversification rapidly tapered off, either temporarily (in the case of products), or permanently (in the case of marketing channels). Later research may clarify whether these findings are generalizable in other socio-economic contexts, as well as in a non-COVID situation.


Subject(s)
Agriculture/methods , COVID-19/epidemiology , Models, Economic , Quarantine/economics , Agriculture/statistics & numerical data , COVID-19/economics , Europe , Farmers/psychology , Humans , Quarantine/statistics & numerical data , Surveys and Questionnaires
3.
J Agromedicine ; 25(4): 423-426, 2020 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1174772

ABSTRACT

Social media use in public health and other health related research applications has seen a rapid increase in recent years. However, there has been very limited utilization of this growing digital sector in agricultural injury research. Social media offers immense potential in gathering informal data, both text and images, converting them into knowledge, which can open up avenues for research, policy, and practice. There are a number of ways social media data can be utilized in agricultural injury research. This paper touches on the adoption of these data sources in health research and discusses the use of social media as an exploratory research tool that can peer into and identify the edges of potential health and safety problems.


Subject(s)
Public Health/instrumentation , Research/instrumentation , Social Media/statistics & numerical data , Agriculture/statistics & numerical data , COVID-19/epidemiology , Farmers/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Occupational Health , Occupational Injuries/epidemiology
4.
J Agromedicine ; 25(4): 409-412, 2020 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1174769

ABSTRACT

North Carolina employs 78,000+ migrant/seasonal farmworkers (MSFWs) annually. Arrival/departure dates are crop and weather dependent. MSFWs may be employed by a grower or a farm labor contractor (FLC). Like farmworker housing, FLCs may be registered or unregistered. Primary care or enabling services are provided by the NC Farmworker Health Program or community health centers that receive dedicated federal funding for MSFWs. The arrival of NC's growing season, MSFWs, and COVID-19 brought unforeseen challenges even to those experienced in caring for MSFWs. Challenges include congregate activities, consistency/accuracy of COVID-19 related communications, availability of alternate housing, barriers to testing and contact tracing, lack of internet connectivity in farmworker housing and insufficient personal protective equipment. Challenges are discussed in no order of occurrence or level of importance as many are inter-related. To meet these challenges, a migrant health and housing workgroup was convened. Members include the NC Department of Labor-Agricultural Safety and Health Bureau, NC Department of Health and Human Services - Communicable Disease Branch and NC Farmworker Health Program, NC Community Health Center Association and NC Agromedicine Institute. Members work collaboratively along the continuum from local to state levels and across agencies and communities to facilitate strategies to address COVID-19 challenges. Implications exist for practice, research and policy including testing of MSFWs on arrival with a 14-day quarantine before moving to assigned farm, a "strike team" to do on-farm tests for workers in the event of a positive case or exposure; and, research on COVID-19 outbreaks and impact of telehealth on MSFWs wellbeing.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Transients and Migrants/statistics & numerical data , Agriculture/statistics & numerical data , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/psychology , COVID-19 Testing , Farmers/psychology , Farmers/statistics & numerical data , Humans , North Carolina/epidemiology , Occupational Health , Quarantine , Seasons , Transients and Migrants/psychology , Work
5.
J Agromedicine ; 25(4): 383-387, 2020 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1174764

ABSTRACT

The corona virus pandemic pulled back the curtain on rural America's already fragile childcare system and shed light on the critical role that quality, affordable, accessible childcare plays in the lives of workers and families, as well as in the success of agricultural businesses. This commentary aims to describe how existing childcare problems were exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic, potentially impacting both the health and economics of farm households and farmworker families. For solutions to be successful, efforts will need to be collaborative, with federal interventions spurred on by childcare stakeholders. Successful collaborations will result in a better childcare system that nurtures children while their parents contribute to our nation's production of agricultural products.


Subject(s)
Agriculture , COVID-19/psychology , Child Care , Farmers/psychology , Adult , Agriculture/statistics & numerical data , COVID-19/epidemiology , Child , Child Care/statistics & numerical data , Child, Preschool , Farmers/statistics & numerical data , Farms , Female , Humans , Male , Parents/psychology , Rural Population , Young Adult
6.
J Agromedicine ; 25(4): 367-369, 2020 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1174760

ABSTRACT

The disproportionate impact of COVID-19 on farmworker communities has been well documented by the media. The virus overlays existing health disparities among farmworkers, but the population is not homogenous. One group of workers that may be even more vulnerable to the transmission of COVID-19 is the H-2A temporary worker population, because they have less control over their physical environments than domestic farmworkers, who may obtain their own housing and transportation. The H-2A program was recently altered at the federal level to ensure a steady flow of essential workers that can protect the nation's food supply during a crisis. Yet, in spite of increasing numbers of COVID-19 cases in states with significant H-2A worker populations, the federal rule that temporarily expanded the H-2A program did not address needs to protect workers' health. Although the CDC has developed recommendations for the agricultural industry to safeguard against COVID-19, most health and safety regulation for farmworkers are left to state and local agencies that may lack knowledge or resources to effectively address the needs of a specialized growing workforce such as H-2A workers. More research is needed on the disparate health and safety needs of H-2A workers to assess how policy can be tailored to reduce the transmission of the COVID-19 virus among the population.


Subject(s)
Agriculture/legislation & jurisprudence , COVID-19/economics , Farmers/legislation & jurisprudence , Workforce/legislation & jurisprudence , Agriculture/economics , Agriculture/statistics & numerical data , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/psychology , Farmers/psychology , Farmers/statistics & numerical data , Healthcare Disparities , Humans , Occupational Health , Transients and Migrants/legislation & jurisprudence , Transients and Migrants/psychology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL